GroundSignal

Park Ridge · Public record

Certificate of Appropriateness for 3 South Prospect

AI-assisted researchHow this was researched and checked

You are reading edition 1, an earlier version of this page. Read the current edition.

After a brief discussion, the commission approved a certificate of appropriateness for the property as shown in the plans attached to the staff memorandum; the vote was 5–0. The minutes do not describe the work covered, and this account relies on the draft minutes of the meeting.

Documented status: Approved (recorded in draft minutes), Nov 5 2025. Evidence dated . Later outcomes require a later source.

What changed, and when did it take effect?

  1. · Approved · Recorded in draft minutes

    Commission approves the Certificate of Appropriateness

    Meeting date: Nov 5 2025. Motion to approve (item D.1). Item D.1: the motion carried (5 to 0). Address: 3 South Prospect.

    • p. 1 · Draft minutes of Approval of Minutes – Special Meeting Minutes of November 5, 2025 (Draft Minutes), Historic Preservation Commission, Dec 3 2025. Open the quote and source.
    • p. 3 · Draft minutes of Approval of Minutes – Special Meeting Minutes of November 5, 2025 (Draft Minutes), Historic Preservation Commission, Dec 3 2025. Open the quote and source.
    • p. 3 · Draft minutes of Approval of Minutes – Special Meeting Minutes of November 5, 2025 (Draft Minutes), Historic Preservation Commission, Dec 3 2025. Open the quote and source.
    • p. 3 · Draft minutes of Approval of Minutes – Special Meeting Minutes of November 5, 2025 (Draft Minutes), Historic Preservation Commission, Dec 3 2025. Open the quote and source.

What was requested, recommended, approved, contracted, reported paid and completed?

Amounts are read from the cited pages and added up by code. A recommendation, an award or an authorized amount does not establish that money was paid.

No amount is published for this item.

Contracts, payments and completion

No contract, payment or completion record is published for this item. Approval alone does not establish completion.

Which parcels, agencies, businesses and projects are explicitly connected?

Official identifiers and exhibit listings connect records. A name, an address or distance alone only suggests a connection.

No explicit connection is published for this item.

What remains unresolved?

No condition or deadline is published for this item. That is a limit of the published research, not evidence that none exist.

Open questions

No open question is recorded for this item.

What does the evidence suggest, and what would change it?

No conflicting records are published for this item.

Official source records

  1. Approval of Minutes – Special Meeting Minutes of November 5, 2025 (Draft Minutes)

    Historic Preservation Commission, Dec 3 2025

Editions and corrections

Each published change is a new edition. Corrections say what changed and why.

  1. Edition 2(current)

    Edition 2: 1 revised.

  2. Edition 1(shown on this page)

    First edition.

Editorial responsibility: GroundSignal. Source review: . Independent research; not affiliated with a government agency.

Suggested citation: GroundSignal, “Certificate of Appropriateness for 3 South Prospect,” sources reviewed 2026-09-24, source records listed on this page.

Initial permanent evidence page published September 10, 2026. Follow the dated evidence above for later additions and changes. A source-check date alone does not establish a government action or project outcome.