GroundSignal

Park Ridge · Ordinance

Cannabis business prohibition text amendments

AI-assisted researchHow this was researched and checked

You are reading edition 1, an earlier version of this page. Read the current edition.

After the City Council opted out of permitting cannabis business establishments, text amendments were proposed to define them in the Zoning Ordinance and prohibit them in all zoning districts. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted to recommend approval, adding language that covers businesses allowing cannabis consumption on premises; the motion carried 9–0. The vote is a recommendation; City Council action is not part of this record.

Documented status: Committee recommendation (recorded in draft minutes), Nov 14 2019. Evidence dated . Later outcomes require a later source.

What changed, and when did it take effect?

  1. · Committee recommendation · Recorded in draft minutes

    Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the text amendments

    Hearing date: Nov 14 2019. Item IV.B: the motion carried (9 to 0). Condition (use): with the addition of language to Section 16.3 general terms to insert “and including any cannabis consumption on premises business.

    • p. 1 · Draft minutes of APPROVAL OF MINUTES – November 14, 2019 (Draft Minutes), Planning and Zoning Commission, Nov 26 2019. Open the quote and source.
    • p. 8 · Draft minutes of APPROVAL OF MINUTES – November 14, 2019 (Draft Minutes), Planning and Zoning Commission, Nov 26 2019. Open the quote and source.
    • p. 7 · Draft minutes of APPROVAL OF MINUTES – November 14, 2019 (Draft Minutes), Planning and Zoning Commission, Nov 26 2019. Open the quote and source.

What was requested, recommended, approved, contracted, reported paid and completed?

Amounts are read from the cited pages and added up by code. A recommendation, an award or an authorized amount does not establish that money was paid.

No amount is published for this item.

Contracts, payments and completion

No contract, payment or completion record is published for this item. Approval alone does not establish completion.

Which parcels, agencies, businesses and projects are explicitly connected?

Official identifiers and exhibit listings connect records. A name, an address or distance alone only suggests a connection.

No explicit connection is published for this item.

What remains unresolved?

  • Open

    with the addition of language to Section 16.3 general terms to insert “and including any cannabis consumption on premises business

    Confirm dates with the City before relying on them.

    • p. 7 · Draft minutes of APPROVAL OF MINUTES – November 14, 2019 (Draft Minutes), Planning and Zoning Commission, Nov 26 2019. Open the quote and source.

Open questions

No open question is recorded for this item.

What does the evidence suggest, and what would change it?

No conflicting records are published for this item.

Official source records

  1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – November 14, 2019 (Draft Minutes)

    Planning and Zoning Commission, Nov 26 2019

Editions and corrections

Each published change is a new edition. Corrections say what changed and why.

  1. Edition 2(current)

    Edition 2: 1 revised.

  2. Edition 1(shown on this page)

    First edition.

Editorial responsibility: GroundSignal. Source review: . Independent research; not affiliated with a government agency.

Suggested citation: GroundSignal, “Cannabis business prohibition text amendments,” sources reviewed 2026-09-24, source records listed on this page.

Initial permanent evidence page published September 10, 2026. Follow the dated evidence above for later additions and changes. A source-check date alone does not establish a government action or project outcome.